Sorry, cannot display the section at this time.

Jerry Galland

Jerry’s Point of View

  • Comments

Looks like Brandon D. Church committed perjury. What say the commissioners?

September 10th, 2013 at Tue, 10th, 2013 at 1:11 am by Jerry Galland

What 4 of our elected fire commissioners are not willing to tell you about where your tax money is going.

When they rushed to pass the motion to hire the attorneys Patterson, Buchanan, Fobes & Leitch to defend Brandon Church in the Department of Health investigation of his personal EMT license, Commissioners Bill Gates, James A. Fossos, Mark Thompson and John Rickert either knew about this deceit and chose to ignore it, or blindly took the word of someone who has been proven to be a cheat and a liar. Again.

Either scenario is bad and puts the department at risk. Serious risk. And shines a bright light on some very questionable, possibly unethical, possibly illegal, behavior from your elected commissioners.

It is a proven fact that Brandon Church was found guilty of unprofessional conduct. And that he was on probation in October and November of 2012. Read the investigation report.

 

Renewal of much needed license to keep his job

 

In late October 2012, Brandon Church was required to renew his EMT license. Failure to have an up-to-date license meant he would not be able to do his  job. We can all understand his motivation to keep his license current.

His application for renewal included the usual questions. All the important ones required a NO response. But considering Brandon Church was in the middle of a 12 month probation for unprofessional conduct, I am very concerned about his answer to one question in particular. And his attestation under penalty of perjury.

 

Applicant’s Attestation

On the application, there is a section titled Applicant’s Attestation which reads in part:

I, BRANDON D. CHURCH, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the following is true and correct:

  • I am the person described and identified on this application.
  • I have read RCW 18.130.170 and RCW RCW 18.130.180 of the Uniform Disciplinary Act.
  • I have answered all questions truthfully and completely.
  • The documentation provided in support of my application is accurate to the best of my knowledge.

 

There are a few more paragraphs then below is what has been accepted as the electronic signature of Brandon Church and the date of October 30, 2012.

 

 

Application for EMS Recertification.

See the answer to question 7? Brandon Church, while on probation for unprofessional conduct with our fire department, answered “NO” in big bold type to:

“Have you ever been found in any proceeding to have violated any state or federal law or rule regulating the practice of a health care professional?”

The problem though is that Brandon Church was found guilty by his supervisors at South King Fire & Rescue. Of Unprofessional Conduct. In March of 2012, a mere 8 months earlier.

 

RCW 18.130.180

What does the law that Brandon Church attested under penalty of perjury say?

Here are some pertinent excerpt from this chapter.

The following conduct, acts, or conditions constitute unprofessional conduct for any license holder under the jurisdiction of this chapter:

(1) The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption relating to the practice of the person’s profession, whether the act constitutes a crime or not.

(2) Misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact in obtaining a license or in reinstatement thereof;

(7) Violation of any state or federal statute or administrative rule regulating the profession in question, including any statute or rule defining or establishing standards of patient care or professional conduct or practice;

(13) Misrepresentation or fraud in any aspect of the conduct of the business or profession;

(20) The willful betrayal of a practitioner-patient privilege as recognized by law;

 

So where does Brandon Church stand in integrity?

Remember that question on his renewal application?

“Have you ever been found in any proceeding to have violated any state or federal law or rule regulating the practice of a health care professional?”

Brandon Church, while on probation for unprofessional conduct, answered “NO” in big bold type.

 

It would appear that Brandon Church willfully and consciously perjured himself.

And 4 of our elected commissioners have duped us about giving a personal gift of our tax dollars for private purposes.

What can Commissioners Bill Gates, James A. Fossos, Mark Thompson and John Rickert possibly say to justify this?

And what does this say about the integrity of these four elected officials?

Is there something in this article that you think needs to be addressed? Want them to explain themselves? Want them to know how you feel?

Use the links below to contact them at their official department email address. If you get a response, please share it with me.

 

Ask Chairman Bill Gates a question

Ask Commissioner John Rickert a question

Ask Commissioner Mark Thompson a question

Ask Commissioner Jim Fossos a question

Ask Commissioner Mark Freitas a question

 

 

As a side note:

Tax dollars pay attorney for personal services and the public doesn’t even get a contract?

Anyone else find this disturbing?

 

 

August 13, 2013

 

 

 

To:              Mr. Jerry Galland

 

From:           Lauri Perry

Executive Assistant

 

REQUEST:    Copy of contract with the attorney or law firm representing any employee(s) of South King Fire & Rescue as a result of action taken at the August 5, 2013 Special Meeting of the Board of Commissioners. Please include the name, address, telephone number and other contact information for the attorney or law firm. Also include the budget line item, number and description that the funds will be or have been taken from to secure these legal services.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

The District has no records responsive to the above request.

 

 

 

 

From: Jerry Galland
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:42 PM
To: Perry, Lauri
Subject: PRA request – Legal action approved August 5, 2013

 

 

Lauri Perry

SKF&R  Public Records Officer

 

Ms. Perry,

 

Dated Tuesday August 6, 2013, and pursuant to Chapter 42.56 of the Washington State Revised Code of Washington, I am making a Public Records Act Request for the following public records:

  • Copy of contract with the attorney or law firm representing any employee(s) of South King Fire & Rescue as a result of action taken at the August 5, 2013 Special Meeting of the Board of Commissioners. Please include the name, address, telephone number and other contact information for the attorney or law firm. Also include the budget line item, number and description that the funds will be or have been taken from to secure these legal services.

 

When these documents are available, please provide them in electronic format and send them to me at

Should any of these records be withheld, please identify the specific legal exemption which justifies the denial and explain how that exemption applies to this request.

Respectfully,

 

Jerry Galland

 

I am active in the arena of government accountability. In order to stay on the pulse and help keep the public informed, without compensation, I have attended every regular meeting and almost every Special meeting of the Board of Commissioners since October 2010.

More articles by  >
ABOUT COMMUNITY BLOGS: Community blogs are written by volunteers. They are members of our community but not employees of this site or newspaper. They have applied or were invited to blog here but their words are their own and are not edited by the editor or staff of this site, and have agreed to abide by our Terms of Use. The authors are solely responsible for their content. If you have concerns about something you read on a community blog, please contact the author directly or email us.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in the PNWLocalNews.com community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.